Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2017

Limitation - PJSC Taftnet V Bogolyubov

Court of Appeal holds that English court can allow addition of a claim which is time barred by the governing law identified by Rome I or Rome II...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Alert - [2017] EWCA Civ 1581

Court of Appeal holds that English court can allow addition of a claim which is time barred by the governing law identified by Rome I or Rome II

CPR r17.4 gives the English courts jurisdiction to allow the addition of a new claim to proceedings after the expiry of a time limit under "(i) the Limitation Act 1980; (ii) the Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984; or any other enactment" (if the new claim arises out of the same (or substantially the same) facts which are already in issue). The issue in this case is whether CPR r17.4 applies where a claim is time barred under the governing law identified by the Rome I or Rome II Regulations.

As mentioned above, CPR r17.4 refers to a limitation period under the Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984. That in turn provides that section 35 of the Limitation Act 1980 (the statutory provision to which CPRr17.4 gives effect) is disapplied where the law applicable to limitation is determined by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from