Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MARCH 2025

Freezing Injunctions: The Double-Edged Sword Of Commercial Litigation

Gatehouse Chambers
Gatehouse Chambers
Contributor

Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial set with expertise spanning commercial dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gatehouse Chambers

Lord Justice Donaldson famously described the freezing injunction as one of the law's two "nuclear weapons" (alongside search orders).

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Lord Justice Donaldson famously described the freezing injunction as one of the law's two "nuclear weapons" (alongside search orders). But like any powerful weapon, its deployment requires careful consideration, precise timing, and meticulous preparation.

A freezing injunction allows a claimant to apply to court without notice to prevent a defendant from disposing of or dealing with their assets. Once granted, it creates an immediate financial stranglehold – banks freeze the defendant's accounts, leaving them access only to limited funds for living and legal expenses.

However, this power comes with significant responsibilities and challenges. The courts won't grant such a draconian remedy without compelling evidence and careful consideration. The consequences of getting it wrong can be severe – applicants who obtain freezing orders wrongfully may face substantial damages claims under their cross-undertaking.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from