Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2025

FRAND Forum Disputes And Interim Licences: Samsung v ZTE

Lewis Silkin
Lewis Silkin
Contributor
Lewis Silkin

Lewis Silkin

Joint managing partners: Jo Farmer, Richard Miskella International offices: Dublin, Hong Kong...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lewis Silkin

The Court of Appeal's decision in Samsung v ZTE clarifies a live question in SEP/FRAND litigation: when parties are locked in a global forum battle, does pressing for your preferred court amount to bad faith?

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal's decision in Samsung v ZTE clarifies a live question in SEP/FRAND litigation: when parties are locked in a global forum battle, does pressing for your preferred court amount to bad faith? The answer, at least on these facts, is no.

The backdrop in a nutshell

Samsung and ZTE are negotiating a renewed global cross-licence over cellular SEPs (now including 5G). Samsung sued first in England for a global FRAND determination and related relief. Within days, ZTE launched proceedings in the Chongqing Court in China for a global FRAND cross-licence. ZTE also filed infringement cases in several jurisdictions (Germany, UPC, Brazil, Hangzhou), while Samsung responded in kind in some fora and brought competition claims elsewhere. Both sides floated interim cross-licence terms on substantially the same commercial footing, with a single sticking point: which court's final FRAND determination should govern any true-up—London (Samsung) or Chongqing (ZTE).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from