Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JANUARY 2013

Extensions Of Time And Loss And Expense

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

In this important decision (one of several to be decided between these parties) the court clarified the position in respect of several issues which arise regularly on construction projects.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Walter Lilly & Company Limited v Mackay & Anor [2012] EWHC 1773 (TCC)

In this important decision (one of several to be decided between these parties) the court clarified the position in respect of several issues which arise regularly on construction projects. In relation to loss and expense claims, the judge confirmed that the obligation on the Architect/Contract Administrator to "ascertain" loss and expense does not mean that the contractor has to prove its claim "beyond reasonable doubt" instead, the balance of probabilities test applies.

The judge also confirmed that it is legitimate for the contractor to bear in mind the knowledge that the Architect/Contract Administrator has of the project when supplying supporting documents for his claim. The judge also took the opportunity to clarify the position with regards to extensions of time where there are concurrent delays to the works. It was confirmed that (unless there are express contractual terms

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from