Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2010

Expert Witnesses: Immunity On The Brink

The Supreme Court is set to rule upon whether an expert witness retains immunity from suit in relation to evidence given in civil proceedings.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Simon Chandler
Simon Chandler
Giles Tagg
Giles Tagg

The Supreme Court is set to rule upon whether an expert witness retains immunity from suit in relation to evidence given in civil proceedings. In Jones v Kaney a certificate for leave to appeal direct to the Supreme Court on this point has been granted, effectively leap-frogging the Court of Appeal.

A consultant clinical psychologist was retained to act as an expert witness for the claimant in a personal injuries claim. Following a telephone discussion between the experts in the case, the claimant's expert signed a joint statement prepared by the opposing expert, without making any comment or amendment. She later said that the joint statement did not reflect what she had agreed in the telephone discussion but that she had felt 'under pressure' to sign it. As a result of the damaging nature of admissions in the joint statement, the claim was settled for a sum that was considerably less than would have been the case if the claimant's expert had not signed the joint

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from