Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2024

Embracing Compulsory Alternative Dispute Resolution: Proposed Changes To The Civil Procedure Rules

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

Earlier this year, we examined the Court of Appeal's decision in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council and discussed how this case highlighted the court's ability to compel parties...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In light of Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council, the Civil Procedure Rules Committee has announced a consultation on Alternative Dispute Resolution and proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules.

Earlier this year, we examined the Court of Appeal's decision in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council and discussed how this case highlighted the court's ability to compel parties in court proceedings to engage in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) such as mediation.

By way of reminder, it was decided that the court could lawfully stay proceedings to order the parties to engage in non-court-based dispute resolution processes. However, this can only happen so long as the order does not impair the claimant's right to proceed to a judicial hearing and is proportionate to achieving the legitimate aims of settling the dispute fairly, quickly and at a reasonable cost.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from