Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 NOVEMBER 2011

Court Rules On Unmarried Couples' Property Rights

DMH Stallard LLP
DMH Stallard LLP
Contributor
DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard delivers successful outcomes for businesses and individuals by providing tailored...

View firm profile
Explore more from DMH Stallard LLP

Judgment giving 90% of house to woman who paid mortgage for 13 years has implications for millions of unmarried couples in England and Wales.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Judgment giving 90% of house to woman who paid mortgage for 13 years has implications for millions of unmarried couples in England and Wales.

A Supreme Court judgment this week, which awarded Patricia Jones the overwhelming share of an Essex bungalow, has redefined the property rights of unmarried couples and has triggered calls for legal reform. Patricia Jones was challenging a Court of Appeal ruling which gave her former partner Mr Kernott an equal share of the home's value.

The decision by 5 Supreme Court Justices makes it clear that even though a property is registered in joint names , judges are permitted to substitute a fairer division of the shares in the property.

In this case, the couple bought a house in 1985 in joint names and took out a joint mortgage  The parties separated in 1993 after sharing the home for 8 years. When Mr Kernott moved out, Ms Jones continued to pay the mortgage.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from