Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2015

Court Limits Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards

The courts have been staunch supporters of enforcing arbitration awards but, as David Owens argues in our latest alternative dispute resolution series article, there are limits.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The courts have been staunch supporters of enforcing arbitration awards but, as David Owens argues in our latest alternative dispute resolution series article, there are limits.

It has been a truth universally acknowledged in recent years that the English courts are prepared to go to almost any lengths to facilitate the enforcement of arbitration awards. It therefore comes as something of a surprise that recent developments in the case of Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v Unitech Ltd [2013] EWHC 1323 (Comm) appear to place a limit on what will be allowed.

The case relates to a slum clearance and redevelopment project in Mumbai that went badly wrong. Cruz City was investing in the scheme, and Unitech are one of India's largest real estate and development companies. Under the terms of the arbitration agreement between them, Cruz City commenced a number of LCIA arbitrations against Unitech in London. It was largely successful, and in July 2012 obtained a decision that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from