Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2026

Challenging Privilege Claims And Documents Held By Consultants: Key Lessons

Burges Salmon LLP
Burges Salmon LLP
Contributor
Burges Salmon LLP

Burges Salmon LLP

Burges Salmon is an ambitious, sustainable and inclusive firm that ensures its clients, people and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Burges Salmon LLP

The High Court has clarified the threshold for challenging an opponent's disclosure process and privilege claims, emphasizing that the absence of expected documents alone does not justify ordering a costly second review. This decision explores when courts will intervene in disclosure disputes and how proximity to trial affects such applications.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation v International Airfinance Corporation & Ors [2026] EWHC 2326 (Comm), the court made clear that simply because there was a "surprising and critical" absence of strategy documents which were expected to have existed does not necessarily mean there is anything wrong with that opponent's disclosure process or the assessment of legal privilege. Before asking the court to investigate further, there must be more than a general suspicion: see Crane Bank v DFCU Bank [2026] EWHC 522 (Comm), per Dame Clare Moulder at [15]-[16]. Even then, parties must act promptly in making the challenge, and it is likely that the court will only order further searches or reviews where it furthers the overriding objective, particularly when trial is imminent. The outcome was, however, very fact-specific, and each challenge will turn on its own circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from