Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JANUARY 2003

Challenging Arbitral Awards: Finality is Good But Justice is Better

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sarosh Zaiwalla
Sarosh Zaiwalla

Sarosh Zaiwalla is an English solicitor and a member of the International Court of Arbitration. Neither he nor his firm have appeared on behalf of the parties before the arbitration tribunal in the three cases discussed in this article. His firm. Zaiwalla & Co. has however, represented one of the parties in all the three court challenges.

Much has been said for the concept of finality of an arbitral tribunal’s award. An arbitral tribunal’s award must be final and binding on the parties; that is what commercial parties want and this is a general accepted proposition. There are however, exceptions to this principal, although these are rare and far between. For example, if after an award had been rendered, it were discovered that one of the arbitrators was guilty of corruption in regard to the particular arbitral process, a court would not enforce the award.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from