Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Bridging Loans – Does A Bridging Lender's Default Interest Rate Constitute An Unenforceable Penalty?

Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP
Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP
Contributor

Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP

Vast experience acting for domestic and international governments, medium to large national and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP

The Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's decision that a 4% monthly default interest rate in a bridging loan was a penalty, remanding the case for proper application of the penalty test.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In January 2024 we published an article about the case of the case of Houssein & Ors v London Credit Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 1428 (Ch) where the High Court held that a default interest rate in a bridging loan agreement secured by residential property constituted a penalty clause and was unenforceable – "Bridging Lender's Default Interest Rate: High Court Deems 4% Default Interest an Unenforceable Penalty Charge"

In summary, the High Court held that the default interest rate (4% per month) did not protect any 'legitimate interest' of the bridging lender and that it was an unenforceable penalty. The Court further declared that interest at the standard contractual rate (1% per month) was payable by the borrower instead on any unpaid sums after the specified repayment date.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from