Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 NOVEMBER 2017

60 Seconds With Erin Miller Rankin

Erin Miller Rankin talks to Yasmin Mohammad about the landmark decision in Essar Oilfields Services Ltd v Norscot Rig Management Pvt Ltd awarding the costs of funding to a claimant.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Erin Miller Rankin, Head of Construction – Middle East and Asia at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer talks to Yasmin Mohammad, Senior Counsel at Vannin Capital about the landmark decision in Essar Oilfields Services Ltd v Norscot Rig Management Pvt Ltd awarding the costs of funding to a claimant.

Yasmin Mohammad (YM): First and foremost, what is your gut reaction to this landmark decision awarding the costs of funding to a claimant?

Erin Miller Rankin (EMR): While this is clearly a positive step for third party funding (TPF), I think the outcome of this case should be viewed with cautious optimism, largely due to the fact-intensive analysis supporting the conclusion that the recovery of costs under the Arbitration Act "can" include the costs of obtaining litigation funding. As Judge Waksman QC noted in his decision, "all that this conclusion entails is that ... litigation funding costs fall within the arbitrator's general costs discretion." Accordingly, while TPF

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from