Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 AUGUST 2026

State Immunity And Enforcement Of ICSID Arbitration Awards

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

The UK Supreme Court has ruled on whether sovereign states can invoke immunity to resist enforcement of adverse ICSID arbitration awards in English courts. Spain and Zimbabwe challenged the registration...

United KingdomInternational Law

The Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.À.R.L. and another; Republic of Zimbabwe v Border Timbers Ltd and another [2026] UKSC 9

This Supreme Court decision concerned the application of state immunity in the context of the enforcement of ICSID arbitration awards in the UK. On appeal, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether Spain and Zimbabwe could rely on their on their sovereign immunity under the State Immunity Act 1978 (“SIA”) to set aside the registration of two adverse ICSID awards in the High Court under the Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act 1966 (the “1966 Act”). The UK has given effect to its obligation to make the provisions of the ICSID Convention effective in its territories under the 1966 Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from