Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2026

The Plot Thickens... G 1/24 (And G 1/25): EPO Update

Lewis Silkin
Lewis Silkin
Contributor
Lewis Silkin

Lewis Silkin

Joint managing partners: Jo Farmer, Richard Miskella International offices: Dublin, Hong Kong...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lewis Silkin

As we have previously reported, in last year's decision G 1/24, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the European Patent Office (EPO) confirmed that the description and drawings of a patent specification...

United KingdomIntellectual Property

As we have previously reported, in last year's decision G 1/24, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the European Patent Office (EPO) confirmed that the description and drawings of a patent specification should always be taken into consideration when determining the scope of the claims for the purposes of assessing patentability (novelty and inventive step).

(And, as also reported here, in pending referral G 1/25, the EBA is currently being asked to decide whether there is any legal basis in the European Patent Convention (EPC) for the EPO to require the description of a patent or patent application to be amended so as to be in line with amendments made to the claims. More on that later...)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from