Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2015

Selecting From Lists At The EPO – The "Two-Lists Principle"

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

The European Patent Office (EPO) has a reputation for applying a strict approach to assessment of basis for amendment under added matter (Article 123(2) EPC).

United KingdomIntellectual Property

The European Patent Office (EPO) has a reputation for applying a strict approach to assessment of basis for amendment under added matter (Article 123(2) EPC). EPO law dictates that there must be "direct and unambiguous basis" for amendments in the application as filed and the bar for meeting that standard is high.  Much of the EPO case law around this provision has focussed on what constitutes direct and unambiguous basis, and from within this developing legal framework has emerged some useful rules of thumb that can provide guidance for both European and overseas patent practitioners alike.

Selecting subject matter from lists has direct relevance to the examination of added matter and novelty. This is because creating a new combination by selecting features from one or more lists will either mean: a) the amendment will add matter where the lists in question are in the patent application as filed; or b) the amendment will impart novelty where the lists in question are

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from