Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2017

ReMarks - 3rd Quarter 2017

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

The 3rd quarter edition of our ReMarks newsletter is out

United KingdomIntellectual Property
Michael Shaw
Michael Shaw
Michael Barrett
Michael Barrett
Chris Hemingway
Chris Hemingway
Will Jensen
Will Jensen
Will Nieuwenhuys
Will Nieuwenhuys
Thomas Prock
Thomas Prock
Mairi Rudkin
Mairi Rudkin
Upasana Patel
Upasana Patel
Author LinkedIn connections

The 3rd quarter edition of our ReMarks newsletter is out, including:

  • Supreme Court decision on Actavis v Eli Lilly (Doctrine of Equivalents)
  • Working with the new EU Trade Mark Regulation
  • Brexit: A first look at the UK's EU Withdrawal Bill's implications for IP
  • New PPH program between Malaysia and EPO
  • Brexit: European Commission publishes position paper on IPRs
  • Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Indicates that a "Promise" is not the Solution
  • The "plausibility" requirement at the EPO
  • Warner-Lambert's pain continues in Singapore 
  • EPO engages with Unitary Patents 

To view the full article please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Samsung Ordered To Pay The Swatch Group US$11.6 Million In Damages For Trade Mark Infringement

The High Court has awarded the Swatch Group US$11.6 million in negotiation damages against Samsung for trade mark infringements involving watch face apps on the Galaxy App store. Rejecting both parties' extreme valuations of US$170 million and US$301, the court established important principles for assessing damages when brand owners don't license their marks and no comparable market royalties exist.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Article

High Court Clarifies The Limits Of Copyright Claims Against Online Marketplaces

The UK High Court has delivered a landmark ruling on online marketplace liability, dismissing Shein's copyright infringement claims against Temu and clarifying when platforms can be held responsible for third-party content. The judgment examines the boundaries of copyright ownership in complex supply chains and establishes important precedents for how marketplace operators should respond to infringement allegations.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
HGF Law
HGF Law
Article

IP Right Infringement By Re-posting Of Photographs On Social Media – Assessing Damages, Calculation Of Interest And Costs Recovery In The IPEC

A copyright infringement case in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court examines how damages should be calculated when a defendant used thousands of photographs from Max Power magazine on social media to build a following and promote commercial events. The court's decision provides important guidance on determining reasonable licence fees for social media use and the application of IPEC's costs cap provisions.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
RPC
RPC
Article

A FRANDly Forum? The Growing Role Of Arbitration In SEP Disputes

Standard-essential patent disputes reveal a fundamental tension between territorial patent rights and global technology markets. While patents are enforced nationally, the standards they protect operate across borders, triggering parallel proceedings in multiple jurisdictions. FRAND arbitration offers a potentially coherent alternative by allowing parties to place international SEP portfolios before a single specialist tribunal, though questions of consent, validity, competition law and enforceability compl
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

English Court Of Appeal Approves Choice Of Arbitration As Global (F)RAND Venue For SEP Licensing Disputes When Made By SEP Owners

The English Court of Appeal has endorsed arbitration as an acceptable means of dispute resolution for resolving global (F)RAND disputes when proposed by standard-essential patent owners. This controversial decision effectively compels SEP licensees to arbitrate against their will, based on the principle that where multiple RAND approaches exist, the SEP owner's choice is determinative, creating an inherent asymmetry in the licensing framework.
GlobalIntellectual Property
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Article

Takeaways From UC Berkeley Law AI Institute

UC Berkeley Law AI Institute brought together academics, venture capitalists, judges, lawyers, and general counsels from leading AI companies to discuss critical issues spanning intellectual property, privacy, European regulation, and AI governance. The event revealed significant gaps in law firm AI policies, explored the judiciary's role in AI implementation, and examined the fragmented regulatory landscape alongside massive US venture capital investment in AI model development.
United StatesTechnology
Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Article

Can Generative AI Help Us Live Longer? Rentosertib Study Suggests Anti-aging Therapies May Be A Step Closer

Insilico Medicine has reported that Rentosertib, an AI-discovered clinical candidate for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, demonstrates effectiveness in reversing the predicted biological age of IPF patients according to six independent proteomic aging clocks. The molecule's dual-purpose approach—targeting both a diagnosable disease and biological aging simultaneously—may open new pathways for anti-aging therapies...
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk