Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 OCTOBER 2022

Preliminary Opinion Published In G2/21 ("Plausibility")

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

As we reported previously, the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal is to consider the question of the admissibility of post-published evidence in the consideration of inventive step, in referral G2/21.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

As we reported previously, the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal is to consider the question of the admissibility of post-published evidence in the consideration of inventive step, in referral G2/21. In brief, the questions asked of the Enlarged Board may be paraphrased as "must post-filing evidence be disregarded if it provides the sole proof of a technical effect in support of inventive step?"; and if so, is this the case in circumstances in which the patent in question either makes this effect "plausible" or at least "not implausible".

A hearing date has been set for 24 November 2022, and the Board has now issued its non-binding preliminary opinion which identifies what, in the Board's view, are the key issues to be discussed. The opinion also takes into account comments submitted by the President of the EPO, and in the 20 amicus curiae briefs filed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from