Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JULY 2025

Have Crocs Taken A Step Too Far?

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

Crocs Inc. has asked the US Supreme Court to clarify whether the Lanham Act could apply to false claims of patent rights following claims made on their website that the Croslite foam...

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Crocs Inc. has asked the US Supreme Court to clarify whether the Lanham Act could apply to false claims of patent rights following claims made on their website that the Croslite foam, used in their shoes, was "patented" when it was not.

The Lanham Act prohibits people who "in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresent the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person's goods, services, or commercial activities". Crocs argues that this act does not apply to intangible properties such as the status of a patent.

This legal question has divided the US courts. Some circuits have said that the misrepresentation is only actionable under the Lanham Act if "the characteristics of the good itself" are misrepresented.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from