Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2025

G 1/24 - How To Interpret Claims When Assessing Patentability

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

The long-awaited decision on G 1/24 was released yesterday. This decision affects the prosecution of every single patent application at the EPO, so it is little wonder that it has been followed with so much interest.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

The long-awaited decision on G 1/24 was released yesterday. This decision affects the prosecution of every single patent application at the EPO, so it is little wonder that it has been followed with so much interest.

Background

A more complete summary of the case can be found in this article written by my colleague, but the main facts are below.

European patent No. 3076804 relates to a vaping device which can apply heat without igniting a substrate/material (e.g. tobacco). Claim 1 of the patent recites that the "substrate comprises a gathered sheet". The term "gathered sheet" is well known in the field of smoking devices, but the description of the granted patent gave the term a broader definition.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from