Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2016

Choice Words: Settlement Agreement Wording

A recent Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) decision has found that vague wording used in a compromise agreement was sufficient in scope to release the defendants from liability...

United KingdomIntellectual Property

A recent Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) decision has found that vague wording used in a compromise agreement was sufficient in scope to release the defendants from liability in relation to trade mark infringement and passing off.

The decision issued by the IPEC concerns a UK trade mark owner's claim to trade mark infringement and passing off. Both parties were in the business of manufacturing pre-cast concrete products.

The claimant's company, Oran Pre-Cast Ltd, owned a UK trade mark for ORAN PRE-CAST. Following an acrimonious split from the claimant's company the defendants set up Oranmore Precast Ltd and commenced use of the signs ORANMORE PRE-CAST and ORANMORE, along with the domain name oranmore.co.uk. The defendants were previously the director and general manager of the claimant's company.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from