Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2008

Wasa V Lexington - Reinsurers Take Note!

On 29 February 2008, the English Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in this follow the settlements case reversing the decision of the judge at first instance.

United KingdomInsurance
Katy-Marie Wilson
Katy-Marie Wilson

Wasa International Insurance Co Ltd and AGF Insurance Co Ltd v Lexington Insurance Co (Court of Appeal, 29 February 2008). On 29 February 2008, the English Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in this follow the settlements case reversing the decision of the judge at first instance.

The judge at first instance had decided that the insurance and reinsurance contracts were not completely back-to-back and, as a matter of law, the reinsured's settlement of the insurance claim did not fall within the terms of the reinsurance, so that the reinsurers did not have to follow it. The Court of Appeal, however, concluded that although there were some differences in the insurance and reinsurance contracts, the parties intended that they should have the same effect and, therefore, as a matter of law, the reinsured's settlement of the insurance claim did fall within the terms of the reinsurance, so the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from