Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2007

PI Insurance: Brokers Duties At Renewal

In a judgment handed down last week the Court of Appeal considered the duties owed by brokers in a brokers chain. The recent case of Fisk -v- Brian Thornhill & Sons will be of interest to brokers and their insurers.

United KingdomInsurance
Stephen Netherway
Stephen Netherway
Sophie France
Sophie France

In a judgment handed down last week the Court of Appeal considered the duties owed by brokers in a brokers chain. The recent case of Fisk -v- Brian Thornhill & Sons will be of interest to brokers and their insurers.

The judgment considers the nature and scope of the duties owed by a placing broker to the producing broker by whom he is instructed and, also, to the ultimate insured. A number of interesting issues arise:

  • Both the Court of Appeal and the parties themselves readily appeared to accept that the placing broker owed a duty to the ultimate insured. No analysis was given as to whether, in light of recent cases such as BP-v-Aon, the requisite legal requirements for such a duty were in fact established.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from