Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2010

Business Interruption Insurance -The "but for" test

The case concerned a claim under a combined property policy covering physical damage and business interruption in respect of the Windsor Court Hotel, a 23-storey property in the central business district of New Orleans.

United KingdomInsurance
Anthony Menzies
Anthony Menzies
James Crabtree
James Crabtree

Orient-Express Hotels v. Assicurazioni Generali SpA (UK Branch)

Commercial Court, 27 May 2010

The case concerned a claim under a combined property policy covering physical damage and business interruption in respect of the Windsor Court Hotel, a 23-storey property in the central business district of New Orleans.

The property suffered significant physical damage from wind and water in the course of Hurricane Katrina, and it was closed throughout September and October 2005. The Hotel re-opened on 1 November 2005, albeit not fully repaired and with its services and amenities not fully operational. The insured sustained significant business interruption losses.

The basic insuring clauses in the policy were in fairly standard terms. Specifically, the insurers agreed to indemnify:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from