Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2016

Ahmed & Ors v Holden (2016)

Nine Claimants (adults and minors), who were all members of the same family, were driving two cars (a Hyundai and a Toyota) 'in convoy' when the Defendant allegedly hit one of the cars from behind.

United KingdomInsurance

Nine Claimants (adults and minors), who were all members of the same family, were driving two cars (a Hyundai and a Toyota) 'in convoy' when the Defendant allegedly hit one of the cars from behind.

Background

The Claimants alleged that their vehicles were stationary at a roundabout, with the Hyundai immediately in front of the Toyota (driven by the First Claimant), when the Defendant's car suddenly hit the Yaris from behind, shunting it into the back of the Hyundai.

All Claimants reported that they suffered personal injury, although they proceeded to complete their shopping before having their injuries investigated. Significant damage to both cars was also alleged.  

The Defendant admitted that the collision took place, but in wholly different circumstances. She noted she had travelled behind the Claimants for ten minutes in slow traffic, when the First Claimant suddenly braked and a low speed collision occurred. The Defendant did not witness a second

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from