Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2024

Directors Duties After The BHS Decisions

Gatehouse Chambers
Gatehouse Chambers
Contributor

Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial set with expertise spanning commercial dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gatehouse Chambers

The BHS judgments highlight expanded director liabilities for breach of the Creditor Duty and wrongful trading, raising concerns about blurred distinctions and their potential impact on fostering a corporate rescue culture.

United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Introduction

In March 2015, BHS was sold for to Retail Acquisition Limited for the princely sum of just £1. Dominic Chappell (a thrice bankrupt former racing driver with no experience in retail) and his fellow directors took the helm of the struggling group. A little over a year later, in April 2016, BHS collapsed into administration and later insolvent liquidation by which point the net deficiency was a staggering £1.3 billion).

Unsurprisingly, the Joint Liquidators brought actions against the directors for wrongful trading (pursuant to s.214 of the Insolvency Act 1986) and misfeasance under s.212 (including breach of the duty to consider the interests of creditors, the "Creditor Duty").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from