Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 SEPTEMBER 2014

Update On Recent Summary Judgment For Barclays In Interest Rate Swap Litigation

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

In a recent hearing in the Cardiff Mercantile Court, His Honour Judge Keyser QC (the Judge) considered various arguments advanced in relation to an interest rate swap.

United KingdomFinance and Banking

(1) Mark Thomas Raymond Bailey; and (2) MTR Bailey Trading Limited v. Barclays Bank plc [2014] EWHC 2882 (QB)

Summary

In a recent hearing in the Cardiff Mercantile Court, His Honour Judge Keyser QC (the Judge) considered various arguments advanced in relation to an interest rate swap.

Many of the points argued will be familiar to those who take an interest in swaps litigation, and the Judge's conclusions on the key points are summarised in this note. Those points include: the proper interpretation of COBS 9 and COBS 10 and the distinction between suitability and appropriateness; the entitlement of companies to bring claims for breach of COBS rules; and the effect which the regulatory regime may have on contractual obligations. Some of the claims advanced appear to be at the margins of the arguable in relation to this type of case. They were unsurprisingly rejected by the Judge and are not considered here.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from