Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2026

Travers Smith's Sustainability Insights: Six Fixes For SFDR 2.0

Travers Smith LLP
Travers Smith LLP
Contributor
Travers Smith LLP

Travers Smith LLP

It is not just law at Travers Smith. We treat our clients’ business as our business, their dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Travers Smith LLP

At the end of last year, we expressed disappointment at the European Commission's proposal for a revised Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR 2.0).

United KingdomFinance and Banking

KEY INSIGHTS

Private markets overlooked: Current SFDR 2.0 proposals fail to accommodate private funds' needs, giving rise to impractical requirements and unintended consequences that could stifle innovation.

Professional investor restrictions: An exemption for communications to professional investors would facilitate open ESG dialogue, prevent "greenhushing", and foster diverse approaches.

Engagement is vital: Now is the time for industry feedback to fix inflexible rules, clarify fund categorisations, and accommodate private markets' strategies.

A regular briefing for the alternative asset management industry.

At the end of last year, we expressed disappointment at the European Commission's proposal for a revised Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR 2.0). We acknowledged that there were some positives, but we argued that private markets were an afterthought in the re-design of the EU's landmark sustainable finance regulation. The text omits

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from