Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2024

Marcus v Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)

Ellisons successfully represented Edward Marcus in a High Court dispute over a £14.5 million family trust. Despite Edward not being the biological son of Stuart Marcus, the court ruled in his favor, affirming his status as a trust beneficiary due to familial circumstances and intent.

United KingdomFamily and Matrimonial

Ellisons recently successfully represented the Defendant, Edward Marcus, in a High Court dispute brought by his brother regarding a complex family trust, holding assets including shares in the family business worth approximately £14.5 million.

Stuart and Patricia Marcus had two children, the Claimant (Jonathan Marcus) and Defendant (Edward Marcus) in the above proceedings. The Claimant and Defendant were raised as brothers. Stuart Marcus was a successful businessman, having founded a toy business in 1962 that later acquired Sequin Art. The family business later demerged into two groups of companies, which both Jonathan and Edward worked within.

With a view to protecting his assets, Stuart Marcus placed shares in the family companies in a discretionary trust in 2003 in favour of his children and remoter issue, which was the subject of this litigation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from