Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2026

Project Nutcracker: Can Parliament Rubber-stamp A DCO To Make It Legally Unchallengeable?

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

The UK Government's proposal to use parliamentary sovereignty to shield energy project consents from judicial review faces fundamental constitutional and practical obstacles

United KingdomEnergy and Natural Resources

The UK Government's proposal to use parliamentary sovereignty to shield energy project consents from judicial review faces fundamental constitutional and practical obstacles

In May this year, the Government published a Policy Paper (Getting Britain Building: Reforming Judicial Review for Infrastructure) with two new ideas for stopping legal challenges from delaying major infrastructure projects: [here].

I have written a previous Nutcracker on the Government’s ‘challenge window’ idea: [here].

In this Nutcracker, I examine the other proposal – the suggestion that Parliament could vote to endorse some development consent orders (DCO), so that they become judicial review proof. 

The big sell: Parliamentary sovereignty

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from