Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2023

Wrongly Held Belief About Performing Physical Activity While On Sickness Absence Led To Disability Discrimination

Wrigleys Solicitors LLP
Wrigleys Solicitors LLP
Contributor
Wrigleys Solicitors LLP

Wrigleys Solicitors LLP

As a leading specialist practice outside of London, Wrigleys has embraced the modern era while...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wrigleys Solicitors LLP

Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EQA) protects workers and employees against unfavourable treatment for ‘something arising in consequence of' a disability...

United KingdomEmployment and HR

EAT confirms employer's belief can be 'something arising in consequence of disability'.

Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EQA) protects workers and employees against unfavourable treatment for 'something arising in consequence of' a disability, where the treatment cannot be justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

A common example is when an employee is disciplined for taking sickness absence in breach of the employer's absence policy when the absence is disability-related and the disciplinary action cannot be justified.

When deciding whether an action is 'something arising from' a disability, the tribunal will first apply an objective test, considering what was the 'something' and whether this 'something' arose from a disability. It will then decide whether the less favourable treatment was as a consequence of the 'something', exploring the subjective state of mind of the decision-maker.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from