Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2026

UK: Balancing Protected Beliefs

The recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision offers employers further guidance on manifestation of belief cases.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

At a Glance

We look at the evolving state of protected belief discrimination in the recent UK Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case of Ngole v. Touchstone Leeds, which offers employers further guidance on the appropriate analysis in manifestation of belief cases following last year's Court of Appeal decision in Higgs v. Farmor's School.

The Legal Framework: Manifestation of Belief After Higgs

In Higgs v. Farmor's School, the Court of Appeal clarified how tribunals should analyse employer action in response to an employee's manifestation of belief in direct discrimination cases (see our previous article here).

It held that an employer cannot dismiss or otherwise disadvantage someone simply because they have expressed a protected belief that the employer (or others) find unpalatable. If the action is taken because of the belief itself, it amounts to unlawful direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from