Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2026

TUPE, Harmonisation And Indirect Discrimination Risk

A recent EAT decision emphasizes that while TUPE protects terms upon transfer, it does not shield an employer from claims post-transfer.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

At a Glance

A recent EAT decision emphasizes that while TUPE protects terms upon transfer, it does not shield an employer from claims post-transfer.

For many businesses, outsourced services are part of the landscape, helping companies to manage costs and focus on key business areas. However, TUPE transfers arising from outsourcing and insourcing can still create challenges. A recent decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Anne & Others v. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust provides an important reminder that where a TUPE transfer creates a situation in which employees are employed on different terms across a workforce, the fact of the TUPE transfer does not automatically shield an employer from claims arising from discriminatory differences.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from