Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2004

The End of ‘Without Prejudice’ Discussions?

Employers will often have "without prejudice" conversations with employees in the context of ‘managing out’ an employee where no dispute between the employee and the employer has actually arisen. However, such conversations are technically admissible in proceedings.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Employers will often have "without prejudice" conversations with employees in the context of ‘managing out’ an employee where no dispute between the employee and the employer has actually arisen. However, such conversations are technically admissible in proceedings.

Employers will now need to be particularly careful when holding such conversations following the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s ("EAT") recent decision in BNP Paribas v Mezzotero.

Ms Mezzotero raised a grievance following her return from maternity leave. Her employer held a "without prejudice" meeting with her and offered her a termination payment if she agreed to leave the bank. Ms Mezzotero filed a claim of sex discrimination and victimisation in the Employment Tribunal. In her claim she referred to the termination meeting. The EAT decided that these allegations were admissible in evidence as the employer had abused the "without prejudice" rule.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from