Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2014

Restrictive Covenants – Should They Be Read Literally?

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

If a drafting error renders a restrictive covenant useless if read literally, is it still enforceable?

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Geoff Mendelsohn
Geoff Mendelsohn

Prophet plc v Huggett [2014] EWHC 615 (Ch)

If a drafting error renders a restrictive covenant useless if read literally, is it still enforceable?

A contract between a software developer and an employee containing a clause which restricted the employee from joining a competing business only operated to prevent the employee, a sales manager, from being engaged or employed in connection with any products in which he was involved during his employment. As no competitor would ever be selling the claimant employer's products, the clause was completely ineffective. The court was nevertheless prepared to read words into the clause to produce a commercially sensible result.

Relevant law

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from