Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2018

Recent UK Uber And Deliveroo Cases

Keystone Law
Keystone Law
Contributor
Keystone Law

Keystone Law

Keystone Law is a pioneering law firm, driven by the belief that the traditional model needed to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Keystone Law

Vanessa Barnett, Consultant Solicitor at Keystone Law, unpicks some of the interesting nuances involved in two recent UK cases concerning the gig economy...

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Vanessa Barnett
Vanessa Barnett

Vanessa Barnett, Consultant Solicitor at Keystone Law, unpicks some of the interesting nuances involved in two recent UK cases concerning the gig economy: firstly the Employment Appeal Tribunal decision involving Uber, and secondly the Central Arbitration Committee judgment in regards to Deliveroo.

If you were distracted by the more headline grabbing stories about bad behaviour and paying off hackers at Uber, you may have missed some interesting nuances afoot on the finer points of how the humans in the gig economy are being categorised and the implications of that for both the humans and those running a gig economy technology platform. In September Uber spent two days in an Employment Appeal Tribunal ('EAT'), running an argument which is not new to any of us: in the spirit of Star Wars, let's just call it the "This is not the taxi company you are lookingfor" argument. The original Employment Tribunal ('ET') case, from which the appeal was triggered, was brought

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from