Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2009

Employment Update - Summer 2009

Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP
Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP
Contributor
Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP

Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP

Penningtons Manches Cooper’s head office is in the City of London. There are further UK offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP

This update keeps you informed of new developments in employment law and focuses particularly on an extension to the scope of disability discrimination legislation and a Court of Appeal ruling relating to an employer reserving its position in relation to facts which it later attempts to rely on as grounds for summary dismissal.

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Jon Heuvel
Jon Heuvel

This update keeps you informed of new developments in employment law and focuses particularly on an extension to the scope of disability discrimination legislation and a Court of Appeal ruling concerning an employer reserving its position in relation to facts which it later attempts to rely on as grounds for summary dismissal.

A Costly Mistake

A tribunal has ruled that an employer is obliged to continue paying a part time bank worker her full time salary, despite a mistake.

The claimant had worked for a bank for a number of years in a part time role and in 2006 there was a TUPE transfer. Prior to the transfer there was an expectation amongst employees that rates of pay would increase. Miss Keenan was on a salary of £9,500 prior to the transfer; afterwards she received a statement that her basic salary was £17,000, which she regarded as a substantial and overdue pay rise. Barclays never queried the discrepancy; the bank even provided a reference confirming her

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from