Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MAY 2002

Compromise Agreements Must Continue to Relate to "Particular Proceedings"

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Minaxi Woodley
Minaxi Woodley

As the Employment Bill passes through the House of Lords, the Government has come under pressure to remove the clause which would have allowed Compromise Agreements to use broad wording to settle a wide range of possible employee claims, rather than have to specify which particular complaints are being settled, as is the position at the moment.

The Government had hoped that relaxing the current rules (and following the format frequently used in ACAS settlement agreements) would go some way to helping its objective of making it easier to settle disputes in the workplace.

Concerns were raised in the House of Lords that this change would leave such agreements open to misuse, allowing employers to compromise all future claims by entering into this type of agreement. The Government does not agree that this would necessarily result, but has decided to drop the clause from the Employment Bill. Lord Sainsbury in his announcement on 30th April confirming the deletion of the clause from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from