Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2010

Agency Workers - Mind The Gap

The question of whether a person supplied by an agency to another business ("an end-user") can ever become an employee of that end-user has been considered by the appeal courts, most recently in the case of "Muschett v HM Prison Service".

United KingdomEmployment and HR

The question of whether a person supplied by an agency to another business ("an end-user") can ever become an employee of that end-user has been considered by the appeal courts, most recently in the case of Muschett v HM Prison Service. The early cases indicated a willingness to imply a contract between the agency worker and an end user, where an examination of the relationship revealed features typical of an employee/employer relationship. However, the test which the Court of Appeal has favoured since the 2008 case of James v London Borough of Greenwich is one of "necessity". In that case, the Court of Appeal:

  1. Confirmed that the mere passage of time will not result in an implied contractual relationship between the individual and the end-user.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from