Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 APRIL 2017

A Growing Gig Economy

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

In Boxer v. Excel Group Services Ltd ET/3200365/2016, Mr Boxer brought a successful claim against Excel Group Services Ltd (Excel) for one week's holiday pay.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

In Boxer v. Excel Group Services Ltd ET/3200365/2016, Mr Boxer brought a successful claim against Excel Group Services Ltd (Excel) for one week's holiday pay. Mr Boxer had been a cycle courier for Excel since September 2013. His contract described him as a "subcontractor" and he was registered as self-employed with HMRC. Excel did not pay Mr Boxer when he took a week's holiday and so he decided to claim for his holiday pay.

The Employment Tribunal had to decide whether Mr Boxer was a "worker" under section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulation 2(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) in order to determine whether his claim could proceed. The Employment Tribunal concluded that Mr Boxer was a worker. The key considerations for the Employment Tribunal in determining this were:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from