Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2010

Construction Of Contracts: Priority Of Documents

Norton Rose Fulbright
Norton Rose Fulbright
Contributor
Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Norton Rose Fulbright

In the following case, the court had to consider the construction of a contract, and in particular the effect of a clause concerning the priority of documents, in order to determine which of two conflicting provisions relating to the payment mechanism was to prevail.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
Christopher Hill
Christopher Hill
Steve Abraham
Steve Abraham
Donald Warnock
Donald Warnock

In the following case, the court had to consider the construction of a contract, and in particular the effect of a clause concerning the priority of documents, in order to determine which of two conflicting provisions relating to the payment mechanism was to prevail.

The case also raised a point of interest as to the proper approach to be adopted by a party who lost an adjudication on a point of law.

Fenice Investments Inc v Jerram Falkus Construction Limited and Others [2009] EWHC 3272 (TCC)

The employer engaged the contractor to design and construct five residential properties and a commercial unit in Camden. The contract incorporated the JCT Design and Build Contract (Revision 1) 2007 (JCT Contract) subject to amendments agreed between the parties.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from