Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 1998

Cases Under The 1996 Arbitration Act

Norton Rose Fulbright
Norton Rose Fulbright
Contributor
Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Norton Rose Fulbright

United KingdomPrivacy
Introduction

The new English Arbitration Act 1996 has now been in force for almost two years. This is perhaps a convenient time to review the manner in which the courts have been applying the Act. A selection of the more important cases decided under the new arbitration law is reviewed below.

(a) Stay of Legal Proceedings - Section 9

Perhaps the best known of all cases, and one of the earliest decided under the Act, is Halki Shipping Corporation v Sopex Oils [1998] 1 WLR 726. The Court of Appeal had to apply section 9, which provides that, where a contract contains an arbitration clause, any court proceedings which are brought must be stayed unless the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from