Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 AUGUST 2010

Liquidated Damages And Termination

Norton Rose Fulbright
Norton Rose Fulbright
Contributor
Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Norton Rose Fulbright

In the following case the court had to consider whether an employer’s right to liquidated and ascertained damages ended upon termination of the employment of the contractor under the contract.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Christopher Hill
Christopher Hill
Steve Abraham
Steve Abraham
Donald Warnock
Donald Warnock

In the following case the court had to consider whether an employer's right to liquidated and ascertained damages ended upon termination of the employment of the contractor under the contract.

Hall & Shivers v Van der Heiden No 2 [2010] EWHC 586 (TCC)

The employer entered into a JCT Minor Works Building Contract (With Contractor's Design) for "internal refurbishment and remodelling" of a domestic flat in London. The contract commencement date was 21 May 2007 and completion was scheduled for 22 September 2007. Liquidated damages for delay were specified as £700 per week.

The scheduled date for completion was not achieved and disputes arose between the parties which included the claim by the employer for liquidated damages for delay in completion of the works.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from