Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MARCH 2021

A Recent Assessment Of The Board On Attorney-Client Privilege

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Contributor
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law is an eminent, independent Turkish law firm based in Istanbul. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

In its recently published Çiçeksepeti decision, the Board assessed whether certain documents collected by the case handlers during the onsite inspection are within the scope of attorney-client privilege principle.

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

In its recently published Çiçeksepeti decision,1 the Board assessed whether certain documents collected by the case handlers during the onsite inspection are within the scope of attorney-client privilege principle.

The Board launched a full-fledged investigation against Çiçeksepeti Internet Hizmetleri A.S. ("Çiçeksepeti ") on June 4, 2020 (20-27/335-M). Within the scope of the investigation, the case handlers collected certain documents during the onsite inspection they carried out at the premises of Çiçeksepeti. Çiçeksepeti alleged that a three-page document among the acquired correspondence and files fell within the scope of attorney-client privilege. Thus, the document was collected in a sealed envelope in order for the Board to decide on the relevant matter.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from