In its recently published Çiçeksepeti decision, the Board assessed whether certain documents collected by the case handlers during the onsite inspection are within the scope of attorney-client privilege principle.
In its recently published Çiçeksepeti
decision,1 the Board assessed whether certain documents
collected by the case handlers during the onsite inspection are
within the scope of attorney-client privilege principle.
The Board launched a full-fledged investigation against
Çiçeksepeti Internet Hizmetleri A.S.
("Çiçeksepeti") on June 4, 2020 (20-27/335-M). Within the
scope of the investigation, the case handlers collected certain
documents during the onsite inspection they carried out at the
premises of Çiçeksepeti. Çiçeksepeti
alleged that a three-page document among the acquired
correspondence and files fell within the scope of attorney-client
privilege. Thus, the document was collected in a sealed envelope in
order for the Board to decide on the relevant matter.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.