Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 SEPTEMBER 2026

Commitments And Changing Market Conditions: The Yemeksepeti Case

Moroglu Arseven
Moroglu Arseven
Contributor
Moroglu Arseven

Moroglu Arseven

Celebrating its 25th year, Moroğlu Arseven is an independent, full-service Turkish law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Moroglu Arseven

The Turkish Competition Board has partially lifted commitments previously imposed on Yemeksepeti, finding that the online food delivery market has evolved from a near-monopoly to a competitive multi-player environment. This decision examines how binding commitments may be reassessed when market conditions materially change, and explores the treatment of most-favoured-nation clauses under both antitrust and abuse of dominance provisions.

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

The Turkish Competition Board (the “Board”) has partially granted the request to lift the commitments rendered binding1 against Yemek Sepeti Elektronik İletişim Perakende Gıda AŞ (“Yemeksepeti”) in 2021.2

Having found that a material change occurred in the structure of the online food order-delivery platform services market and that Yemeksepeti is no longer in a dominant position in that market, the Board resolved to lift the commitments on the mandatory Joker discount scheme and the mandatory minimum basket amount, as well as the commitment on the pricing policy of the Vale delivery model; the Board further resolved that the commitment on the narrow most-favoured-nation (“MFN”) conditions may be reassessed following an application to be made in two years’ time.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from