Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2017

When Without Prejudice Isn't

The without prejudice rule has long been part of South African law. This rule provides that statements, including admissions of liability, made in an attempt to settle litigation between parties.

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The without prejudice rule has long been part of South African law. This rule provides that statements, including admissions of liability, made in an attempt to settle litigation between parties, are not admissible in subsequent litigation between them. Underpinning the rule is that the parties should be encouraged to avoid litigation by resolving their disputes amicably in frank discussions, without the fear that if negotiations fail, admissions made in the course of their negotiations may be used against them in subsequent litigation.

Until very recently, there was one exception to this rule – admissions of insolvency made on a without prejudice basis may be admissible. However, the Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") has now confirmed a second exception – where an acknowledgment of indebtedness is made by a debtor to a creditor, even on a without prejudice basis for the purposes of settling litigation, the acknowledgment may be admissible for the purpose of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from