Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2024

The Double-Edged Sword Of "Without Prejudice" Offers

Adams & Adams
Adams & Adams
Contributor
Adams & Adams

Adams & Adams

Who we are: Established in 1908, Adams & Adams is an internationally recognised and leading African...

View firm profile
Explore more from Adams & Adams

A judgment stemming from the High Court of South Africa, Limpopo Division, Polokwane serves as a timely reminder that a "without prejudice" offer, if not drafted or approached properly...

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A judgment stemming from the High Court of South Africa, Limpopo Division, Polokwane serves as a timely reminder that a "without prejudice" offer, if not drafted or approached properly, can interrupt the prescription of a claim.

Facts of the case

The plaintiff instituted action against the defendant for the injuries she suffered from a helicopter crash caused by the defendant's helicopter colliding with wires on 6 October 2015. At the time of the crash, the plaintiff was a minor and only reached the age of majority on 8 February 2019. Notably, summons was served on the defendant on 20 July 2022.

Issue(s) for determination

The defendant defended the action and raised a plea of prescription, pleading that the plaintiff's claim prescribed on 8 February 2020, one year after the plaintiff attained the age of majority. The parties agreed to separate the issue of the special plea of prescription from other issues for determination.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from