It is not uncommon for the contracting parties to a written
agreement to verbally agree on additional terms or terms which are
intended to vary the content of the written agreement. This is
often done with honest intentions, as having to conclude additional
or varying terms in writing to the existing agreement may be
perceived as an unnecessary hindrance to efficiently doing
business. Parties eager to "get things done" will often
simply "shake on it", relying on the belief that that the
other party will honour its verbal undertaking.
Such verbal varying of written contractual terms generally work
out well for the contracting parties, until they don't! In this
regard, our law restricts the nature and extent of the evidence
that may be brought when a dispute arises regarding the content and
meaning of a written agreement. The applicable principle is known
as the Parol Evidence Rule.