Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2026

Compulsory Mediation In The Gauteng Division: A 10-month Implementation Review

Adams & Adams
Adams & Adams
Contributor
Adams & Adams

Adams & Adams

Who we are: Established in 1908, Adams & Adams is an internationally recognised and leading African...

View firm profile
Explore more from Adams & Adams

Ten months have passed since the Judge President of the Gauteng Division of the High Court introduced a directive making mediation compulsory before the allocation and retention of civil trial dates.

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

10-Months into Operation

Ten months have passed since the Judge President of the Gauteng Division of the High Court introduced a directive making mediation compulsory before the allocation and retention of civil trial dates. The main objective of the directive was to address the severe backlog in the civil trial roll and to restore the proper functioning of the civil justice system in the Division.

This article provides a brief practical update on the implementation of the directive and highlights some of the key issues that have emerged since it came into operation.

Legal Concerns

At the outset, it is important to acknowledge that the directive was introduced amid considerable debate within the legal profession. Practitioners raised valid concerns regarding the financial burden of mediation costs, particularly for smaller firms, as well as the practical difficulty of compelling meaningful participation from institutional defendants, such as the Road Accident Fund.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from