Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 SEPTEMBER 2023

Singapore Construction Update - Vim Engineering Pte Ltd v. Deluge Fire Protection Is Invoked To Avoid Paying Backcharges And Denied (Pro-Active Engineering Pte Ltd v. Prime Structure Engineering Pte Ltd)

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

Backcharges by contractors are commonly implemented in Singapore construction projects due to issues such as delays in work or poor workmanship by subcontractors.

SingaporeLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Backcharges by contractors are commonly implemented in Singapore construction projects due to issues such as delays in work or poor workmanship by subcontractors. The Singapore High Court has recently shut down a Singapore subcontractor's attempt to avoid paying backcharges claimed by its contractor. In Pro-Active Engineering Pte Ltd v. Prime Structure Engineering Pte Ltd, the claimant ("Pro-Active") alleged it was not given reasonable notice of the work to be de-scoped and backcharged by the defendant ("Prime"). It further alleged that it should also not be liable for them due to a lack of substantiation for the backcharged amounts by Prime. Pro-Active unsuccessfully relied on Vim Engineering Pte Ltd v. Deluge Fire Protection ("Vim"), in which the Singapore High Court had decided to substantially reduce the amount of a contractor's backcharges. In Vim, the subcontractor had raised these same two issues of notice and substantiation. Regarding notice, the Singapore

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from