54 results found

【裁判要旨】たとえ、技術秘密の構成、所有権、侵害及び責任について、当事者間で和解契約の締結等により合意に達した場合であっても

In recent years, there has been growing recognition of the strategic importance of intellectual property ("IP") rights—particularly patents—in corporate business strategy.

A title of design, i.e., an article having the design, should be determined in accordance with the Japanese design classification specified under the ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.

. . . Regarding Corephotonics's second argument, the Federal Circuit found no abuse of discretion in the Board permitting Apple to introduce a new argument—based on the pertinent problem test...

本稿では、売買契約における特許権等の...

"Any request for an extension of time . . . will be looked upon with disfavor." U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Local Rule 7(I)...

The modern Japanese legal system is primarily based on the civil law system, with partial modifications engrafted under the influence of the US legal system after World War 2.

The measures available to a creditor seeking to identify the assets of another party differ depending on whether a judgment in favour of the creditor has already been rendered.

On its face, EscapeX IP, LLC v. Google LLC reads like a cautionary tale ripped from the patent litigation playbook.

１．ロンドン国際仲裁裁判所による仲裁 判断の重大な違法についてイングランド 高等法院が示した判断

The modern Japanese legal system is primarily based on the civil law system, with partial modifications engrafted under the influence of the US legal system after World War 2.